December 8, 2014

Metabolic Theory of Cancer: Cellular Energy Generation 2 - Mighty Mitochondria



We meet again!


If you’re new here, we are in the midst of exploring a fascinating theory regarding the etiology of cancer. We’ve already covered some ways in which cancer cells differ from normal, healthy cells, but we’re holding off on looking at three or four of the most striking hallmarks that make cancer cells different from healthy cells until we have a good understanding of how our cells generate energy.

If youre just tuning in, youll want to check out the previous posts in this series:
  1. Introduction
  2. Cells Behaving Badly
  3. Energy Generation 1 - Glycolysis

Last time, we looked at the biochemical pathways known as glycolysis and fermentation, both of which are old and somewhat “primitive,” and are relatively inefficient ways of harvesting ATP from carbohydrates (glucose, specifically). We briefly introduced the more complex pathway called oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos), also called cellular respiration. Recall that “respiration” is a good way to think of this, since this pathway requires oxygen. OxPhos takes place within specialized structures inside cells, called mitochondria.

If it seems like we’re veering off course to explore all this energy and mitochondrial “stuff,” I promise, these brief forays into cell biology are building a very necessary foundation, without which we won’t be able to make sense of the metabolic theory of cancer. After all, how can we understand cancer as a metabolic disease if we don’t have at least a cursory familiarity with cellular metabolism?


BASIC MITOCHONDRIAL STRUCTURE


So let’s get back to the mitochondria. I explained last time that mitochondria generate large amounts of ATP (cellular energy) by using oxygen. And unlike glycolysis, which is a metabolic pathway that exclusively uses glucose as its fuel source, the cellular respiration that takes place inside mitochondria uses acetyl CoA—and acetyl CoA can come from glucose, fatty acids, and ketones. In terms of foods, this means carbohydrates and fats. (Note: We can also use protein as a fuel source, but as I explained in this post, that is mostly in times of serious energy/caloric scarcity, as protein is far too valuable for other uses [such as building muscles and making enzymes] to be siphoned off to make ATP. Generally speaking, protein is not a primary energy/ATP source—not even accounting for gluconeogenesis on a very low-carb diet. Protein is used to make glucose in that case, but it’s not the primary fuel source powering the body.)

Fatty acids and ketones need oxygen in order to be converted into ATP, and that means they need mitochondria. Recall from our discussion last time that glycolysis does not require oxygen, and that it occurs in the cytoplasm. Unlike glucose, fatty acids and ketones cannot be converted into ATP in the cytoplasm. This needs to happen inside the mitochondria. I said it last time, and I'll say it over and over again: If a cell has no mitochondria, not enough mitochondria, or mitochondria that aren’t working properly, that cell will not harvest any appreciable amount of energy from anything but glucose. As I mentioned last time, this is a gigantic point. GI-GAN-TIC. We will come back to it. Just let it keep getting bigger as it sits in the back of your mind.

Okay, so, in terms of cellular energy generation, mitochondria are a big deal. And the lesson on day one of any good biochem class is: STRUCTURE DETERMINES FUNCTION. The way something works inside the body is the direct result of how it’s built. When things are built properly, they work properly. When they’re not built properly, they don’t work properly. (Again, GI-GAN-TIC, and we will revisit this.) To get an appreciation for the importance of structure & function on a macro level, take a look at that thing at the end of your arm. Yeah, your hand. See the opposable thumb? That is a structure that allows human beings to perform functions unavailable to other animals, such as buttoning dress shirts. (I don’t know why a giraffe or a walrus would want to button a dress shirt; I’m just pointing out that if one did, it’d be out of luck.)


Operating under the guiding principle that structure and function are critically linked, now its time to start learning about mitochondrial structure. Here is a very simplified illustration of what a mitochondrion looks like:

Image source: By Kelvinsong, via Wikipedia Creative Commons



Mitochondria have two layers. There’s an outer membrane, and an inner membrane. (Both circled in red so you can see what they’re pointing to.) Embedded within the inner membrane is ATP synthase—an enzyme, or, rather, the enzyme, that creates ATP. (Yep, its called ATP synthase because it synthesizes ATP. And in biochemistry, almost all enzymes end in “-ase,” like lipase, and amylase, enzymes that digest fats and starches, respectively.)

Something to note is that the inner membrane contains lots of folds. (Notice in the illustration how squiggly it looks.) The formal term for these folds is cristae, and you can see them labeled above. What all this folding does is increase the surface area of mitochondria. And since we need tons of ATP to run our bodies, and this is where most of it is produced, we need all the surface area we can get. All these folds allow for much more ATP synthase to be crammed in. (The same principle applies to the small intestine with regard to digestion--tons of folds to allow for a much greater surface area to absorb nutrients.)

So weve got the outer membrane, an inner membrane, and the matrix. The matrix is the space contained by the inner membrane. Say you had a small beach ball inside a larger beach ball. The matrix is the space inside the smaller ball. And inside the matrix is where the first step toward making lots more ATP happens. (Please, no Keanu Reeves jokes...)

We need to talk just a little bit of biochem here. (Don't get scared! You know Im all about keeping this simple.) 


OXPHOS & KREBS CYCLE

Our end goal is generating ATP, right? And as we established last time, we’ve got some pyruvate kicking around the cell, because pyruvate and 2 ATP are the end products of glycolysis. The 2 ATP are going to be used to power some sort of reaction in the body, so now we’re left with the pyruvate. And we said last time that in the presence of oxygen, and assuming we have healthy mitochondria, the pyruvate generally won’t ferment into lactate. Instead, this pyruvate will eventually yield us 36 additional ATP, for a total of 38 (when added to the 2 ATP we got from glycolysis). Different sources will tell you it's anywhere from 32-38. The point is, it's a lot more than we get from glycolysis alone.

But this doesn’t happen magically. Those additional ATP don’t just show up out of nowhere. In order to get all that ATP, we first have to take the pyruvate and convert it into something called acetyl CoA. We take the acetyl CoA, do a whole bunch of stuff to it, and end up with byproducts that can be used to create ATP.

The process of “doing stuff” to acetyl CoA is called oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos, for short, or cellular respiration). That’s the biochem term for it, and it happens in a kind of loop, or cycle. It’s best thought of as a cycle because there’s really no start and no end; it’s a loop. And acetyl CoA isn’t the only thing that can enter this loop. Our bodies produce other substances that can enter the loop at other places besides the point at which acetyl CoA does. (For example, the amino acid glutamate can be transformed into α-ketoglutarate, and the amino acid aspartate can be transformed into oxaloacetic acid [OAA]. Both α-ketoglutarate and OAA are “intermediaries” of this cycle, and they can enter it at other starting points, so we’ve got lots of different things entering this cycle at different points, not just acetyl CoA. You can see these intermediaries in the illustration below.)

You can see pyruvate being converted into acetyl CoA and entering the cycle toward the upper left (green box), and α-ketoglutarate and OAA circled in orange. DO NOT BE OVERWHELMED BY ANY OF THIS. You absolutely do not have to understand the details here. I'm just giving you a look at the astounding amount of stuff that goes on inside our mitochondria, so we can build a foundation for appreciating the physiological devastation that might ensue if our mitochondria were to malfunction.

Check it out: This is the Krebs cycle / Oxidative Phosphorylation:

Image credit: By Narayanese, courtesy of Creative Commons.


The biochemical reactions that occur in the cycle are OxPhos, and they involve complex stuff I’m not going to bore you with, because it goes beyond our needs for understanding the metabolic basis of cancer. But the name given to the cycle itself is the Krebs cycle. It also goes by “citric acid cycle” and “tricarboxylic acid cycle.” Don’t ask me why it has so many names. Probably somebody didn’t like Dr. Krebs and didn’t want to use his name for it. (Maybe they were jealous that he won the Nobel Prize in 1953 for his work in identifying how this all works.) I will call it the Krebs cycle because that’s what I’ve been calling it since high school biology three zillion years ago.

Okay, OxPhos. Krebs cycle. So what? 
Patience, grasshoppers.


ELECTRON TRANSPORT CHAIN


The Krebs cycle happens inside the mitochondrial matrix. As the cycle…well, cycles, it churns out the byproducts I mentioned above—the ones that ultimately help generate ATP. The way these byproducts do this is by passing through something called the electron transport chain. (You might also see this called the electron transport system, or ETS. Same thing.)

We can think of the ETS as a series of pipes, or tubes, through which electrons (and protons!) must pass in order for us to make ATP. The crucial thing to note here is that these pipes/tubes are embedded within the inner mitochondrial membrane. These byproducts go up and down these tubes, and the final stop is ATP synthase. It all happens within the inner membrane.

Here is a snazzy illustration of the ETS, with the pertinent parts we've discussed so far circled in red or yellow:
Image credit: By Fvasconcellos, via release in public domain.


As you can see, the Krebs cycle (called citric acid cycle here) occurs inside the matrix. And you can also see that the tubes (the light blue things labeled with roman numerals) making up the ETS are embedded within the inner mitochondrial membrane

Since the ETS, with its final stop of ATP synthase, is what actually makes ATP, and since the ETS is housed within the membrane, our next order of business is to talk about membranes.


MITOCHONDRIAL MEMBRANES


The mitochondrial membranes—like most membranes in our cells—are made up primarily of phospholipids (phosphate groups attached to lipids). Recall that lipids are fats. (Here’s a handy primer I did on membranes way back when no one but me was reading this blog.)

Since understanding mitochondrial structure and function is so critical for our appreciation of the metabolic theory of cancer (not to mention multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer’s), let’s go into a little bit of detail regarding membrane structure. (Remember what I said at the beginning of this post: structure and function are inextricably linked.)

Like just about every membrane in animal cells, the mitochondrial membrane is a phospholipid bi-layer. That is geek-speak for “a double layer of fatty acids & phosphate groups.” Say what? An illustration will help us here. This is an extremely simplistic illustration. Membranes typically have tons of stuff (enzymes, glycoproteins, ion channels, etc.) embedded in them, but for our purposes right now, we only need to know about the phospholipids, so let’s take all the rest of that complicated stuff out of the picture.




The membrane in which the electron transport system is housed looks like the bottom picture here—it contains a mix of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids. So one thing to know right off the bat about mitochondrial structure is that if we want healthy mitochondria, we’ve got to have a good supply of all three types of fatty acids: saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated. The proper makeup of the membrane ensures that it is able to do what it’s supposed to do—that is has the right permeability, fluidity, etc. It’s neither too rigid, nor too “floppy,” and whatever needs to get in through the membrane can, and whatever needs to get out can, too. (The red “balls” on either end of the membrane represent the phosphate part of “phospholipid.” For our purposes, we are more concerned with the fatty acids. [I just didn’t want you thinking they were clown noses or something.]) So think about this in light of the longstanding recommendations to limit saturated fat as much as possible and load up on polyunsaturated vegetable oils. Dietary imbalances can most certainly lead to imbalances in what gets incorporated into these membranes. (We’ll revisit this down the line.) And structure --> function. If the mitochondrial membrane is not built correctly, it cannot do its job correctly.

I think that is probably way more than enough for now, so that’s it for this one.


Next time, we’ll still be knee-deep in mitochondrial structure & function, and we’ll take a look at a few things that can cause damage to mitochondria. Remember: when a cell’s mitochondria are damaged, its ability to generate energy (ATP) is compromised. This “energy crisis” at the cellular level due to mitochondrial dysfunction is the heart of the metabolic theory of cancer. So I promise you, we are inching closer and closer to the stuff that will blow your mind. In fact, this is probably the most "difficult"/scientifically detailed post of the entire series. So if you've survived this long, cheer up -- it's going to be way easier from here on out!


Continue to the next post: Mitochondrial Dysfunction


P.S. If you are super bored sometime and want to learn more about ATP, the Krebs cycle, electron transport, and all that jazz, this video is EXCELLENT. No, like, seriously, EXCELLENT. (And all you have to do is sit there!)


P.P.S. Anyone out there good with web design? I'd really like to upgrade this site so it doesn't look like I'm some preschooler messing around. I have no idea what I'm doing WRT websites...Please contact me privately if you can help. 




Remember: Amy Berger, M.S., NTP, is not a physician and Tuit Nutrition, LLC, is not a medical practice. The information contained on this site is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any medical condition.

9 comments:

  1. Thanks for the illustrations. Biology class was a long time ago.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Amy,
    Wish you had been my biochemistry lecturer at Uni. I did all that stuff all those decades ago, but did I understand it? No! Got through exams via rote learning. I love the way you make this "applied biochem". After all these years I'm finally seeing an application behind the theory, and suddenly I want to learn and understand it. Many thanks. Looking forward to your next post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What a great compliment! Thanks so much! I'm glad it's coming across well. I'm approaching all this with the philosophy that I'm trying to explain it the way I would want someone to explain it to *me,* if all this was new to me. (And the fact is, my own biochem classes left a few things to be desired. I had great professors and learned a ton, but they usually presented the science & the mechanisms without connecting it back to practical applications in the human body. So, okay, it works this way and that way...but what does that *mean* when it comes to different foods, or disease processes? My favorite professor, in fact, spent a bunch of time talking about how fats are metabolized in the body, and the influence of insulin, but then proceeded to call low-carb diets "malpractice." I approached him after class and said I had a bone to pick with him. To his credit, he was totally open-minded. We ended up talking for about 90 minutes. I quoted his own lecture back to him, showing him why LC makes so much sense. He's now a believer. ;-) I think it helped that he was a 65+-year-old Italian man who was struggling to lose weight, eating lots of pasta.)

      Delete
  3. I love this series, Amy. Thank you so much for writing it. I plan to reread the whole thing once it's complete. Fascinating!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Amy,
    you wrote:
    'So one thing to know right off the bat about mitochondrial structure is that if we want healthy mitochondria, we’ve got to have a good supply of all three types of fatty acids: saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated. The proper makeup of the membrane ensures that it is able to do what it’s supposed to do—that is has the right permeability, fluidity, etc. It’s neither too rigid, nor too “floppy,” and whatever needs to get in through the membrane can, and whatever needs to get out can, too.'
    Do we know what percentage of each type of fatty acids our cell membranes are composed of?
    Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know. Someone has probably looked into it somewhere, but I don't know off the top of my head. Don't drive yourself too crazy, about it. ;-) Major stress about what/how we eat might be worse for health than chowing down on some soybean oil. :P

      Delete
    2. Oh don'ty worry, I'm definitely not going crazy over all of this nutrition stuff. I love to know for the sake of knowing, that doesn't mean my life revolves around this!
      Thanks for 'taking care' of me!

      Delete
  5. Very workmanlike, I like the way you prepare the ground.
    I'm of two minds here, part of me wants to say you should rewrite Seyfreid's book to make it more comprehensible yet at the same time your style while wonderful at explaining things would make professionals leery and want to label you as a lightweight. Maybe, and this is a profound hope, there will emerge a middle group of intelligent laypersons who can challenge the orthodox professionals to, in essence, do the right thing and consider alternatives to the inianity they are currently producing. Maybe that's your niche.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for all your comments, Tim! You're clearly a trooper if you're working your way through my cancer posts at the rate you seem to be. I've been told by a few readers - and I believe, myself - that one of my strengths, as someone who writes about nutrition and health, is my ability to "translate" the science and biochemistry into plain English that all of us can understand. This, in my opinion, is what's missing from the ridiculous news headlines and "clickbait" blog post titles - the actual *science.* It's easy to write sensationalist articles that are based in what someone *wishes* were true, but it's hard to argue with the actual *facts* about human anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry. I try to stick to the facts, but I'm not too proud to admit that I have my own biases. But at least I'm upfront and honest about those biases. It's hard to read my blog or follow me on Twitter and *not* understand that I am low-carb oriented. (But open-minded enough to realize that this is not the optimal strategy for everyone.)

      Thanks again for reading! The posts you've gotten through so far are really just the warmup. The ones after mitochondrial function will blow your mind.

      Delete